29 September, 2017

Stereotypes and exoticism

Let's make this clear. I don't like the word "ethnic." It conjures up non-existent exoticism. It implies "you're different." Why is Korean food "ethnic" but German food not? Is English food ethnic? If not, why not? How about South African cuisine? Do most people even know what it is? Portuguese (not Brazilian) vs Spanish?

Lately I've noticed a lot of neologism implying Japanese origin. Give something a Japanese-sounding name and it becomes elevated and hip, like "emoji," "yuba," "seitan," etc. Maybe it's because stereotypes of the Japanese tend to be positive? How soon we forget how Japanese-Americans were treated 60 years ago. Maybe it's because it sounds exotic but is still pronounceable.

My point is, certain cultures have been exoticized and romanticized. All cultures have their own characteristics, but it seems non-European cultures are more likely to be seen as exotic. Even practices that are limited to a very small region become "representative." Just read Internet comments on eating dogs, but we eat squirrels in the South and guinea pigs (aka cuy) in South America. There is major outcry over whale meat but we hardly hear a whimper on puffins. Not everyone with easy Internet access is an expert, but it certainly results in plenty of unsubstantiated comments.

I think people just need to get out more. I really don't think the Pope is exotic.

So, reader, I am asking for your stories. Have you found yourself calling something "ethnic" or "exotic" because it's not what you're familiar with? Do you spend time finding out more about the culture, or do you rely on stereotypes for information?

As always, please keep it civil and relevant. I promise I will refrain from commenting on your experience, but I might be curious enough to ask questions to better understand your story.

No comments:

Post a Comment