We have an identity problem. If we can’t agree, we’ll always be jostling for resources and recognition. There is no easy answer.
In other countries, the nationality comes first, then the ethnicity: e.g., British Asian, Canadian Chinese, etc. We have it the other way round.
Asian Americans cannot agree who is Asian American. Should South Asians be in a different category? What about Central Asians, who look “Asian” but are culturally more similar to Eastern Europeans? And, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders cannot agree if the APA or AAPI umbrella does them justice.
Recent anti-Asian hate crimes have been perpetrated primarily against anyone who looks East Asian, and that includes Southeast Asian (we can’t expect racists to be able to tell the difference, but that’s beside the point). South Asians had/have been mistaken for people of Middle Eastern descent. That’s also beside the point (who said racists were smart?).
When people say Asian, most of the time they imply East or Southeast Asian (maybe even Central Asian, who look “almost” East Asian but without the East Asian names).
Hashtag-StopAAPIHate and hashtag-StopAsianHate have been divisive. Some say we should not say Asian because recent hate incidents and crimes have been committed against Asian Americans. Sorry, the US is not the only country on the planet. Citizens of Asian descent in other countries have also been victims of race-based incidents and crimes. It’s not a uniquely American phenomenon.
The question is, should Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders and South Asians be separated from the APA label? We need representation, and we need strength in numbers. Would that hurt or help us? I don’t know what the answer is.
Comments are welcome, but please be courteous.

